Quote:Are you suggesting a set up like this
Data Container
---Data note 1
---Data note 2
---Data Note 3
Prototypes
---prototype 1
---prototype 2
Templates
---template 1
---template 2
I am no Tinderbox guru, compared with either of the Marks (Anderson or Bernstein). But here is the variant of what you suggest, above, that I have set up for most of my files.
I have two root-level containers:
- CONTENT [master container for notes with actual working content etc]
- SYSTEM [master container for all backstage stuff, including agents, prototypes, and other structural info]
In more detail, this means (with outline-style numbering added for clarity only, not as part how I actually name or label them):
I. CONTENT
A. Notes
1...99-- various sub notes
B. People
1...99-- various sub notes
C. Leads [and so on through any relevant container structure for data]
II. SYSTEM
A. Prototypes
1....99 all relevant ones
B. Agents
1...99 relevant agents
C. Templates [and so on through any other relevant structure, including for me Archives in some files.]